Missouri shooting furor shows how social media users help and harm由布賴恩Stelter,美國有線電視新聞網

By Brian Stelter, CNN
August 13, 2014 -- Updated 1220 GMT (2020 HKT)
Watch this video

Lemon interviews Michael Brown's parents

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Twitter, other social media light up with firsthand accounts of protests in Ferguson, Missouri
  • Social media users have drawn attention to details the traditional media have missed
  • However, such impassioned reporting has also spawned speculation, and major errors
  • It's important to check your facts "when emotions are running high," says verification specialist
 

Have you documented the protests in Ferguson? Share your photos, videos and opinions with CNN iReport.

(CNN) -- The photo from Ferguson, Missouri, that stopped me in my tracks was taken by a local educator.

One man was on his knees, arms outstretched to prove to the police that he had no weapon. The other man was still standing, but had his hands up in the air; his shirt covered his mouth, a feeble defense against tear gas.

In the right hand of each man was a cell phone. The standing man was holding his phone so that the camera pointed toward the police.I wondered to myself, was he recording this confrontation?

The interplay between amateur media -- like this photo, taken by Liz Peinado on her phone and immediately posted to Twitter -- and professional media has been impossible to ignore in the days since18-year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed by police in Ferguson, a suburb of St. Louis. Brown was unarmed.

A town in turmoil -- 5 things about Ferguson, Missouri

For every cool-headed account from a reporter, there's been an impassioned Facebook post or Instagram photo from a community member that illustrates, I think, strengths and weaknesses of both traditional and social media.

These days we need both.

 
Michael Brown's friend describes shooting
 
Father: 'I just want justice for my son'
 
Teen shooting in Missouri sparks riots
 
Mom: 'You took my son away from me'

After all, it's one thing to hear a news anchor say that police fired nonlethal rounds to disperse protesters on Monday night; it's another to see photos of the pepper balls and wooden pellets and the bloody injuries they caused.

Jon Swaine, a Guardian reporter on assignment in Ferguson, wrote on Twitter that a St. Louis police spokesperson claimed on Monday night "he didn't know what I was talking about when told protesters claimed they were shot with wooden pellets." On Tuesday morning, Swaine held some of the pellets in his hand and said they matched protesters' descriptions. The police subsequently confirmed the pellets were fired.

Peinado, the local educator who posted the photo I mentioned earlier, wrote on Twitter that she was "devastated" by the use of "tanks, tear gas, rubber bullets, hand launchers, and sheer intimidation of county police."

Peinado's photo of the two men holding cell phones was captioned, "Men armed with nothing but phones ordered to get on their knees. I witnessed tear gas thrown at them."

The same two men were also shown in a Vine video by Antonio French, a local alderman who was perhaps the most prolific citizen journalist during tense protests Sunday and Monday. French's six-second videos of tear gas in the streets of Ferguson were picked up by CNN and other news outlets -- giving audiences at home a raw, close-up view of the situation.

"For the most part, social media has helped bring home the impact of this death in the local Ferguson community in a way that traditional media probably could not have," said David Clinch, the executive editor of Storyful, a company that specializes in finding and verifying newsworthy material on the Web.

What we know about Michael Brown's shooting

There have also been online attempts to hold traditional media outlets accountable. The best example of this is the Twitter hashtag #IfTheyGunnedMeDown, which posed the rhetorical question, "If they gunned me down, what photos would the media use to portray me and my life?"

The hashtag was born after a photo of Brown circulated over the weekend. Some saw the teenager holding up a peace sign; others speculated that it was a gang sign.

Resentment and disappointment about media portrayals of African-Americans was evident in the commentary about the use of the photo.

Yesha Callahan, a writer for The Root, wrote that Brown's death "has once again shown that the narrative the media paints surrounding black people in America more often than not includes depicting us as violent thugs with gang and drug affiliations."

 
Ferguson's timeline of tragedy and violence
 
Police Chief: Michael Brown was 'unarmed'

On Twitter, contributors to #IfTheyGunnedMeDownshared pairs of photos -- one stereotypical or unsavory, another showing the same person on graduation day or surrounded by family.

The same site, however, was also a tool for inflammatory rumor-mongering. Monday night, for instance, some Twitter users shared false claims that another citizen had been shot by police.

And, according to local reports, social media erroneously identified a police officer as the one who shot Brown.

"It is very important to be careful in stories like this, when emotions are running high, to make sure that information and content is verified," said Clinch, who formerly worked at CNN.

Clinch said he has spotted instances of people sharing images and saying they were from Ferguson, when in fact they were from years-old protests in other states.

Teen was two days away from starting college

Perhaps the best example of the interplay between amateur and professional media is also one of the rare bits of good news to come from the current unrest in Ferguson: A photo of local residents cleaning up one of the locations that was looted on Sunday night went viral on Monday:

I saw a number of complaints on Twitter along the lines of "the traditional media will never show you THIS side of the story." But the photo was originally shared on Facebook with a small group of friends -- it went viral with the help of local reporters and television stations. Some of the volunteers were subsequently interviewed by a local newspaper, the Riverfront Times, widely amplifying their act and the message therein.

"We just all put our heads down and got to work," one of the volunteers, Kathryn Banks, told the newspaper. "We'd felt hopeless and helpless watching everything unfold on the news the night before. This was a way we could give back. We felt like there was something we could do."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


由布賴恩Stelter,美國有線電視新聞網
2014年8月13日 - 更新1220 GMT(2020 HKT)
觀看此視頻
檸檬採訪邁克爾·布朗的父母
新聞提要
微博等社會媒體亮起了抗議的弗格森,密蘇里第一手資料
社交媒體用戶都關注到細節的傳統媒體已錯過
然而,這種充滿激情的報告也催生投機,主要的錯誤
重要的是要檢查你的事實“時,情緒高漲,說:”驗證專家
你已經記錄了弗格森的抗議活動?分享您的照片,視頻和意見與CNN的iReport。
(CNN) -弗格森,密蘇里州,即停在我的軌道被採取由當地的教育工作者的照片。
一個人在他的膝蓋上,伸出來證明他沒有武器警械。另一名男子仍然站著,但在空氣中有他的手; 他的襯衫摀住了嘴,對催淚瓦斯微弱的防禦。
在每個人的右手是一部手機。該站在男子拿著他的手機,這樣的相機對準向警方報案。我不知道我自己,是他拍攝的這場交鋒?
業餘媒體之間的相互作用-喜歡這張照片,拍攝由Liz Peinado她的手機上,並立即張貼到Twitter -與專業媒體已經不可能在未來的日子忽略,因為18歲的邁克爾·布朗被槍殺警察在弗格森,聖路易斯郊區。布朗是手無寸鐵。

在動盪的小鎮 - 5件事有關弗格森,密蘇里州
從記者的每冷靜考慮,還有的是由社區成員的說明,我想,優勢和傳統和社會媒體的弱點慷慨激昂的Facebook帖子或Instagram的照片。
這些天來,我們既需要。
邁克爾·布朗的朋友介紹拍攝 父親:“我只是想正義為我的兒子” 在密蘇里州青少年射擊火花騷亂 媽媽:“你從我身邊帶走了我的兒子走”
畢竟,這是一回事,聽到新聞主播說,警方發射非致命彈驅散示威者在週一晚上; 這是另一種看照片的胡椒球,木球團和血腥的傷害,他們造成的。
喬恩施偉賢,在分配中的弗格森監護人記者,在Twitter上寫道,一個聖路易斯警方發言人稱在週一晚上“他不知道我在說什麼的時候告訴抗議者聲稱,他們拍攝的木質顆粒。” 週二上午,施偉賢舉行一些小球在他手上,並說他們匹配的抗議者的描述。警方隨後證實該顆粒被解僱。
Peinado,誰貼我前面提到的照片的地方教育家,在Twitter上寫道,她被“蹂躪”所使用的“坦克,催淚瓦斯,橡皮子彈,手發射,和縣警方純粹的恐嚇。”
Peinado的照片,兩人拿著手機的標題是,“男子手持不過手機下令讓他們的膝蓋上,我親眼目睹了催淚瓦斯在他們身上。”
同樣的兩個人被安東尼法語,當地市議員是誰也許在緊張的抗議週日和週一最豐富的公民記者也表示在藤蔓視頻。法國的六秒鐘的弗格森街頭催淚瓦斯的視頻被拾起CNN等新聞媒體 - 讓觀眾在家裡生的,特寫視圖的情況。
“在大多數情況下,社交媒體幫助把家裡這取死的當地弗格森社區的影響的方式,傳統媒體可能也沒有了,”大衛·克林奇,Storyful的執行主編,該公司專門在尋找說和驗證具有新聞價值的材料在網絡上。
我們知道邁克爾·布朗的投籃什麼
也有一些在網上試圖保持傳統媒體的責任。這方面最好的例子是Twitter的包括hashtag #IfTheyGunnedMeDown,其中提出的反問,“如果他們槍殺我失望,什麼照片就媒體利用來描繪我和我的生活?”
包括hashtag出生後,布朗的照片上週末流傳。有些人認為少年拿著一個和平的標誌; 其他人猜測這是一幫跡象。

不滿和失望的非裔美國人的媒體描繪為明顯對使用照片的評論。
夜攝卡拉漢,作家為根寫道,布朗之死“再一次證明,敘述周圍的黑衣人在美國往往不是媒體包括油漆描繪我們的暴徒暴力與幫派和毒品有關係。”
悲劇和暴力弗格森的時間表 警察局長邁克爾·布朗是“手無寸鐵”
在Twitter上,貢獻者#IfTheyGunnedMeDown共同對照片-一個刻板或令人厭惡的,另一個顯示為同一人畢業那天或家人包圍。
同一個站點,然而,也是炎症造謠的工具。週一晚上,例如,一些Twitter用戶共享另一個公民被槍殺警方虛報。
而且,據當地媒體報導,社交媒體錯誤地確定了警察的誰開槍布朗的人。
“要小心這樣的故事,這是非常重要的,當情緒高漲,以確保信息和內容進行驗證,說:”緊抱,誰曾供職於美國有線電視新聞網。
克林奇說,他發現人們分享圖片,並說他們是從弗格森的時候,其實他們是多年的老抗議活動在其他國家的實例。
青少年是兩天了,從大學開始
也許,業餘和專業媒體之間的相互作用的最好的例子也是好消息罕見的一個位來自當前動盪弗格森:一張照片當地居民清理了被洗劫一空在週日晚上的地點之一了病毒週一:

我看到了一些投訴在Twitter上沿的線條“傳統媒體永遠不會告訴你這個故事的這一邊。” 但照片最初是在Facebook上分享了一小群朋友-它的流傳與當地記者和電視台的幫助一些志願者由當地一家報紙隨後採訪了濱河時報,廣泛放大自己的行為,其中的消息。
“我們只是把所有我們頭上來,開始工作,”一位志願者,凱瑟琳銀行,告訴本報記者。“我們會的前一天晚上感到絕望和無助的看著一切展開的消息,這是一種方式,我們可以給予回复。我們覺得有些東西我們可以做的。”

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    evita6804 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()