close

Lance Armstrong: Can the lies and bullying be forgiven?阿姆斯特朗:可以的謊言和恐嚇被原諒?

By Matt Majendie, for CNN
August 20, 2014 -- Updated 1230 GMT (2030 HKT)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
HIDE CAPTION
 
Seven voices on Lance Armstrong
<<
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
>
>>
 
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Lance Armstrong faces multiple challenges as he seeks to restore his fortunes
  • Cyclist has been forgiven by some of his victims, but others are still hurting
  • Some say his apologies in past 18 months do not repair the damage
  • American is also taking on U.S Federal Government in high-stakes court case
 

Editor's note: This is the second installment of a two-part look at the legacy of the Lance Armstrong's doping. In the first installment, Armstrong gives his side of the story.

(CNN) -- He fought cancer and then won the world's toughest bike race seven times -- albeit with the help of a myriad of drugs -- before a precipitous fall from grace.

Worshiped, then demonized, few people polarize opinion quite like Lance Armstrong, perhaps even more so as he seeks rehabilitation in the court of the public view.

"It would be an incredible story of redemption and second chances if he puts himself in a position to deserve that," says Travis Tygart, CEO of the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), whose report led to Armstrong losing all his sponsors and cost him millions of dollars.

"He hasn't done it ... yet but, when it comes to second chances, I'm always hopeful," Tygart told CNN.

No longer 'untouchable'

It could be a long road to redemption given Armstrong's bubbling resentment towards those who brought him down.

 
Armstrong: I doped for Tour de France
 
Armstrong: I deserve to be punished
 
Armstrong emotional over apology to son

In Juliet Macur's 2014 book "The Cycle of Lies," Armstrong says: "I hated those motherf***ers -- the Betsys, the LeMonds, Walsh, I still hate him ... I still hate them."

The disgraced Texan was referring to his former teammate Frankie Andreu and his wife Betsy, three-time Tour de France winner Greg LeMond and Irish journalist David Walsh, all key architects in his downfall.

More than two years on from his report, Tygart comes across as a modern-day Elliot Ness.

Though Ness and his "Untouchables" used guns, Tygart deployed testimonies from many of those closest to Armstrong to bring down the previously untouchable cycling superstar.

The American lawyer repeatedly held out an olive branch to Armstrong with offers to confess his sins and serve the same six-month suspension dished out to his former teammates.

Armstrong never came to see him, but Tygart still hopes the day will come.

"It takes time," Tygart says. "Floyd Landis (himself a former Tour winner later exposed as a drugs cheat) denied it and attempted to take us down for doing our job.

"It was a couple of years after he served his sanction that he decided to come in and be truthful. Hopefully Lance Armstrong can and will move on.

"Everyone comes around to the rules and when you're living your life as a fraud and stealing from people and not living an open and transparent life, that's not the way to do it.

"To err is human, that's a big factor in our world. Absolutely, we can forgive and we should offer the opportunity for second chances.

"It's what we're about but that second chance has to be earned, it has to be more than just cheap lip service, a real attempt to make amends."

 
Doping and cheating in sports
 
The state of drug testing in sports
 
How cheaters should be punished in sports

Tygart's position is admirable given that during his quest, there was immense pressure on him to halt his investigation, attempts to bankrupt USADA and bring down the organization, even personal threats to the lawyer.

"I don't like hate mail and death threats but shame on us if you don't have the courage to set that aside and move on," he says. "The evidence was so overwhelming beyond any doubt that we had to just move on regardless."

'He needs to stop being an asshole'

Armstrong's former teammate Scott Mercier is another to demonstrate a generous willingness to forgive.

In 1997, at the age of 28 and in the prime of his career,the U.S. Postal rider was handed a detailed drugs regimen by the team's doctor (who has since been banned from the sport from eight years despite his denials) and told to stick to it.

Mercier's decision not to dope was the day his cycling career ended.

At a similar crossroads to Armstrong -- who would join the team the following year -- and so many others, Mercier opted to not cheat, and walked away instead.

It makes it all the more surreal that Mercier, who lives about a two-hour drive from Armstrong in Colorado, regularly drives to a halfway point between the pair's respective homes, where they unpack their bikes and go for a ride.

"I have to recognize that Lance is 80% gray, 10% white and 10% black," says Mercier.

"I think there are three camps in the U.S.: those that absolutely hate him and will never forgive him, those that overlook everything that he did and those that are a bit indifferent.

"I think he'll be forgiven but he needs to keep doing what he's doing. He's showing some humility, he needs to stop being an asshole and be nice. He has regrets. He's spoken about the bullying and I know he regrets that."

Mercier admits there have been times when he's grown concerned for his friend, with the magnitude and rapidity of his fall from grace.

"I don't think he'll ever get back to the perch that he was on. He was deified for 10 years and now he's demonized but he's just a human being. I think part of the problem is that he can't get over the USADA decision against him."

'Lying bully'

Not everyone is prepared to forgive, let alone believe that Armstrong deserves another chance.

His best friend when he first broke onto the European circuit in the early 1990s was fellow American Frankie Andreu.

The pair were tight -- Frankie and Lance -- an American double act, living together and trying to break into the notoriously inhospitable ranks of continental racing.

Andreu and his wife Betsy were in the hospital room in October 1996 when a then cancer-riddled Armstrong admitted to doctors the cocktail of drugs he had ingested as a professional cyclist.

Fast forward to 2014 and Andreu is reluctant to discuss Armstrong.

 
'We called it the Lance mafia'
 
Armstrong says ex-wife knew he doped
 
Could charges land Armstrong in jail?

"There is no rehabilitation for Lance Armstrong as long as he keeps telling lies and continues to bully and slander people," Andreu said in a two-line email sent to CNN.

"I don't even know how you would make a program (or write an article) about something that does not exist."

Armstrong rang the Andreus the night before his very public mea culpa on Oprah Winfrey's TV show.

Frankie was not keen to take his call. He said to his wife: "When he doesn't follow through on anything, I will say 'I told you so.' "

Betsy, though, decided to give Armstrong another chance and initially thought he was genuine. He said sorry to her on air and they arranged to meet to talk things through, but she says Armstrong pulled out of the meeting.

"For three months I talked to him: texts, email and telephone," she recalls.

"He then completely canceled on me, saying 'Sorry, I can't meet you,' but then he tells people I rebuffed him.

"Sometimes I get sick of it and wish he'd just leave me alone, to leave me out of it, but he still mentions my name. It's his mess but if he is to lie about me and go after me, I will fight back."

She is a formidable woman.

Forced to testify in Armstrong's case against SCA Promotions, which had paid him millions, the cyclist painted a picture of a bitter and twisted woman.

She may have lacked the financial clout of Armstrong but her fight is a match for anyone, with a very clear view on what's right and wrong.

"In 2013, he said I had no credibility but he's a pathological liar," she says.

"What am I supposed to do after that rant in Juliet Macur's book? His actions to this date are not of someone who wants to make amends.

"Everything that he's done, it's just the same Lance. He's talking about people and he's trying to deceive the public, and thinks that if he says sorry it's enough.

"But sorry is just a word. After everything he did to me, I extended an olive branch and he snapped it. That was a hard thing to do after all the lying and smearing of me."

So is he just the same Lance of always?

"I think he always will be," Betsy Andreu says. "He will fight and draw out the court cases as long as he possibly can.

"A tiger doesn't change its stripes. I really think he needs help and I hope he gets it. Maybe then he would stop the lying and could be on his way to healing. An authentic sorry means making amends, not just saying the words."

When 'sorry' is not enough

Greg LeMond, cycling's dominant force in the late 1980s, was another who faced the wrath of Armstrong's legal team -- and that of the bike manufacturer Trek -- due to an interview with Walsh for Britain's Sunday Times in 2001.

"If Lance is clean, it is the greatest comeback in the history of sports," LeMond, the only American now recognized as a Tour de France champion, told the paper. "If he isn't, it would be the greatest fraud."

 
Cyclist: Armstrong is the greatest fraud
 
Lance Armstrong's trail of pain

It effectively sounded the death knell at the time for his own business and it led to him staying away from the sport that made him a star.

Legal action is potentially looming from LeMond's side. "I'm looking at all the options -- nothing is closed to me," he tells CNN.

"Some of this has been awful -- it was scary at times. I was running out of money with legal fees," he adds.

"For a lot of people it was scary having someone so focused on destroying you for so long. I feel relieved that that's all partly over but you never know, I've ruffled a lot of feathers at Trek.

"What goes around comes around. There is still much stuff that has never hit the news. I'd have a hard time. I couldn't even begin to explain what was happening. It's hard to put into words and even describe the people."

LeMond admits he has no sympathy for Armstrong and also believes that the former rider is not about to admit the error of his ways wholeheartedly.

"I never say never, but I don't think he's ready to be totally honest," he says.

"I don't think he ever will be. We'll see. But I think he has a lot of problems with the government."

'Too much baggage'

Sunday Times chief sports writer Walsh wrote a book about his battle to expose Armstrong, "Seven Deadly Sins," which led to the newspaper being sued for $1.5 million by Armstrong for daring to suggest he was doping.

 
Journalist's crusade to expose Armstrong
 
Journalist: Armstrong destroyed lives
 
Author: Clamor for Armstrong confession

Walsh's sympathy lies with the cyclists who opted not to cheat.

"I feel sorry for the people who rode clean and got screwed, the Christophe Bassons and Filippo Simeonis of this world," he tells CNN.

"There are some people that believe he should be given back his Tour titles as there was no-one legitimate to take them, but that would merely legitimize what they did.

"I'm sorry but I think he should get hung up. Armstrong getting back into cycling is a nonsense."

Armstrong met with the Cycling Independent Reform Commission (CIRC) in May, but the details of that meeting have not been made public.

As for last year's Oprah interview, Walsh says: "I think he was sincere to the point that he wanted to be."

So how does he see Armstrong at this point, and what is the way forward for him?

"What I see is a guy struggling with the reality of now being irrelevant," adds Walsh. "He had some very significant people when he won all those Tours, and in the years after, that wanted to be in his presence.

"He was an iconic figure. That's gone. I'd like him to get on with his life and move forward, to spend time with his kids, have an enjoyable personal life and play golf. But he should stay away from public life -- there is too much baggage."

Taking on the state

More legal wrangling lies ahead for Armstrong.

The biggest and potentially most costly is a case against him by the U.S. Federal Government over its sponsorship of Armstrong's former U.S Postal Service team. Should he lose it will be a more costly day than when he went on Oprah.

"I think if he can win this case it will be bigger than winning seven Tours de France, and I think he stands a chance of winning," says American journalist Reed Albergotti.

The Wall Street Journal reporter, with fellow journalist Vanessa O'Connell, penned the 2013 book "Wheelmen: Lance Armstrong, the Tour de France and the greatest sports conspiracy ever."

 
Lance Armstrong's trail of pain
 
Team masseuse claims Armstrong doped

"The U.S. Department of Justice doesn't like to go to trial unless it thinks it has a good chance of winning and jurors have tended to side with athletes, and that could happen here," Albergotti suggests.

"The one thing we can count on is that he's gearing up for another fight."

Albergotti argues that the fight that made Armstrong such an impressive cancer survivor and such an impressive cyclist has been to his detriment as he tries to recover his own reputation while he remains persona non grata in the U.S.

His and O'Connell's greater interest was not so much in the doping but in the conspiracy not just of Armstrong but those around him.

"If he was truly contrite and really felt bad about what he did to people like Greg LeMond and the Andreus, he would be acting differently," says Albergotti.

"But he's still trying to paint LeMond as this crazy boozer, and made Betsy Andreu look like a hysterical woman. He's tried to destroy people's reputations and it's not something he's really addressed.

"He doesn't seem to be humbled at all and you want to see that from someone in his position. He's acted almost as though he lost a bunch of time in the Tour de France and has to make it up and he can do the same thing he's always done.

"It doesn't work that way. People want to see his heart.

"He thinks he can win and he still wants to beat everyone if he can. You see it in the way that he's taking on the U.S. Department of Justice right now.

"I've heard he's telling people he wants to go to trial and beat them -- it's as though this trial is a bike race. He needs to start becoming a better person and there's nothing to stand in his way apart from him."

It's Armstrong's move next.

阿姆斯特朗:可以的謊言和恐嚇被原諒?
由馬特Majendie,為美國有線電視新聞網
2014年8月20日 - 更新1230 GMT(2030 HKT)

隱藏字幕
七聲音在蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗
<<
<
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>
>>
新聞提要
蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗面臨著多重挑戰,因為他試圖恢復他的命運
騎單車已經原諒了他的一些受害者,但其他人還在受苦
有人說,他在過去18個月的道歉不修復損傷
美國也正在對美國聯邦政府在高風險的情況下,法院
編者按:這是一個兩部分看阿姆斯特朗的興奮劑遺留的第二批。在第一部分中,阿姆斯特朗給了他身邊的故事。
(CNN) -他打了癌症,然後獲得了世界上最棘手的自行車賽七次-從雍容的急劇下跌之前-儘管有藥物無數的幫助。
崇拜,那麼妖魔化,很少有人評價兩極分化很喜歡阿姆斯特朗,或許更是這樣,因為他試圖重建在公眾視野的法庭。
“這將是救贖和第二次機會,一個令人難以置信的故事,如果他把自己的位置,不值得說,”特拉維斯·泰加特,美國反興奮劑機構(USADA)的首席執行官,他的報告導致阿姆斯特朗失去了所有的贊助商說:而損失了數百萬美元。
“他並沒有這麼做......但,但是,當涉及到第二次機會,我總是希望,”泰加特告訴CNN。
不再是“賤民”
這可能是一個漫長的道路,贖回給阿姆斯特朗的冒泡的不滿對那些誰把他打倒。
阿姆斯特朗:我摻雜了環法自行車賽 阿姆斯特朗:我應該受到懲罰 阿姆斯特朗情緒過度道歉,兒子
在朱麗葉Macur的2014年的著作“謊言的循環,”阿姆斯特朗說:“我討厭那些motherf *** ERS ​​ - 的Betsys的LeMonds,沃爾什,我還是恨他......我還是恨他們。”
灰頭土臉德克薩斯指的是他的前隊友弗蘭基·安德魯和他的妻子貝齊,三次環法自行車賽冠軍格雷格·萊蒙德和愛爾蘭記者戴維·沃爾什,在他倒台的所有關鍵架構師。
從他的報告中兩年多,泰加特遇到作為一個現代埃利奧特內斯。
雖然尼斯和他的“鐵面無私”用手中的槍,泰加特部署的證詞很多那些最接近阿姆斯​​特朗打倒以前碰不得自行車巨星。
美國律師多次伸出了橄欖枝阿姆斯特朗與報價交代自己的罪孽和服務相同的6個月的懸浮拋出了他的前隊友。
阿姆斯特朗從不來看望他,但泰加特還是希望這一天會來的。
“這需要時間,”泰加特說。“蘭迪斯(本人曾經巡迴賽冠軍後公開為藥物作弊)否認,並試圖帶領我們走上了做我們的工作。
“這是幾年他擔任他的懲罰,他決定進來,是真實的。希望阿姆斯特朗能夠而且將會繼續前進了。
“每個人都來自各地的規則,當你的生活你的生活,作為一個欺詐和偷竊的人,而不是生活的開放,透明的生活,這不是做它的方式。
“是人都會犯錯,這是在我們的世界的一大因素。當然,我們可以原諒,我們應該提供機會,第二次機會。
“這就是我們即將但這第二次機會,必須賺了,那一定是不僅僅是廉價的口頭上,真正嘗試彌補。”
興奮劑和作弊的運動 在運動藥物檢測的狀態 如何騙子應該在運動受到懲罰
泰加特的立場是值得欽佩的考慮,在他的追求,還有對他的巨大壓力,以阻止他的調查,試圖破產USADA和搞垮組織,律師甚至是個人的威脅。
“我不喜歡仇恨郵件和死亡威脅,但可恥的是我們,如果你沒有設置拋開,繼續前進的勇氣,”他說。“證據是如此壓倒性的超越,我們必須繼續前進,無論任何懷疑。”
“他需要停下來是一個混蛋”
阿姆斯特朗的前隊友斯科特·名士是另一個表現出慷慨的願意原諒。
1997年,在28和在他職業生涯的黃金年齡,美國郵政騎手被移交了詳細的藥物治療方案的球隊的醫生(誰已被禁止從體育的八年,儘管他否認),並告知要堅持到它。
名士決定不摻雜是他的單車生涯結束的那一天。
在相似的十字路口阿姆斯特朗 - 誰也加入我們的團隊,次年 - 和許多其他人,名士選擇不欺騙,走開吧。
這使得它更超現實的名士,誰住約兩個小時的車程,從阿姆斯特朗在科羅拉多州,定期驅動到對各自的家,在那裡他們解開他們的自行車去兜風之間的中間點。

“我不得不承認,蘭斯是80%灰,10%白人和黑人的10%,”名士說。
“我認為有三個陣營在美國:那些絕對討厭他,永遠都不會原諒他,那些忽視他所做的一切,那些有點無動於衷。
“我認為他會被原諒,但他需要繼續做他在做什麼,他表現出一些謙遜,他需要的不再是一個混蛋,並是很好,他有遺憾,他談到了欺負,我知道他感到遺憾的是。 “
名士承認有次當他長大關心他的朋友,他失寵的幅度和速度。
“我不認為他會永遠回到自己是在他被神化了10年,現在他妖魔化了,但他只是一個人,我覺得這個問題的部分原因是他無法得到鱸魚在對他的USADA的決定。“
“說謊欺”
不是每個人都願意去原諒別人,更不用說相信阿姆斯特朗值得一次機會。
他當他第一次打破了到歐洲的電路,在90年代初最好的朋友是美國同胞弗蘭基·安德魯。
兩人都緊張 - 弗蘭克和蘭斯 - 美國的雙重行為,共同生活,並試圖打入大陸的賽車出了名的荒涼的行列。
安德魯和他的妻子貝齊是在醫院的病房裡1996年10月時,那麼癌症困擾的阿姆斯特朗承認醫生的藥,他嚥下作為職業車手的雞尾酒。
快進到2014年和安德魯是不願意討論阿姆斯特朗。
“我們把它叫做蘭斯黑手黨” 阿姆斯特朗說,前妻知道他摻雜 可能費用降落阿姆斯特朗在監獄裡?
“沒有康復的蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗,只要他保持說謊,並繼續欺負和誹謗的人,”安德魯在發給CNN的一個兩行電子郵件中說。
“我什至不知道你將如何做一個程序(或寫文章)關於不存在的東西。”
阿姆斯特朗響了Andreus的晚上,他非常公開前MEA過失奧普拉·溫弗瑞的電視節目。
弗蘭基並不熱衷於接他的電話。他對妻子說:“當他不能在任何跟進,我會說'我告訴過你。” “
貝琪,不過,決定給阿姆斯特朗一次機會,最初以為他是真實的。他說,對不起她的空氣和他們約好談事情經過,但她說,阿姆斯特朗退出了會議。
“三個月來,我跟他說:文本,電子郵件和電話,”她回憶說。
“然後,他完全取消了對我說:”對不起,我不能滿足你,“但後來他告訴人,我拒絕了他。
“有時我生病了,並希望他能就這樣離開我獨自一人,離開我出去了,但他還是提到了我的名字,這是他的爛攤子,但如果他說謊關於我去後,我會努力爭取回來了。“
她是一個可怕的女人。
被迫作證阿姆斯特朗的情況下,對SCA的促銷活動,這已付給他數百萬,騎車人畫了一個痛苦的和扭曲的女人的照片。
她可能缺乏阿姆斯特朗的資金實力,但她的鬥爭是一場比賽的人,對什麼是正確和錯誤的一個非常明確的說法。
“在2013年,他說,我沒有公信力,但他是一個病態的騙子,”她說。
“那我是咆哮的朱麗葉Macur的書以後做什麼?他的行為給這個日子是人誰願意彌補了沒有。
“那他做的一切,這是一樣的蘭斯,他在談論人和他試圖掩人耳目,並認為,如果他說對不起,這是不夠的。
“但遺憾的只是一個字。他所做的一切給我後,我伸出了橄欖枝,他搶購吧,那是一個很難的事情後,我所有的說謊和拖尾的事情。”
所以,是的,他總是一樣的蘭斯?
“我認為他將永遠是,”貝琪·安德魯說。“他會爭取,並繪製出了案件,只要他所能。
“老虎不改變它的條紋。我真的覺得他需要幫助,我希望他得到它,也許那他就停止撒謊,可能是他的方式來治療。正宗對不起方式作出補償,不只是說的話。“
當'對不起'是遠遠不夠的
格雷格·萊蒙德,在80年代末騎自行車的主導力量,又是誰面臨著阿姆斯特朗的律師團隊的憤怒- 自行車製造商迷航和 -由於在2001年接受採訪時沃爾什的英國星期日泰晤士報。
“如果蘭斯是乾淨的,它是體育史上最偉大的復出,”萊蒙德,現在公認的環法自行車賽冠軍的唯一美國人,告訴該報。“如果他不是,這將是最大的騙局。”
騎單車:阿姆斯特朗是最偉大的騙局 疼痛蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗的足跡
它有效地敲響了喪鐘的時候,他自己的生意,它導致了他遠離使他成為明星的運動。
採取法律行動時,有可能從萊蒙德的身邊若隱若現。“我找了所有的選擇 - 什麼是封閉我,”他告訴美國有線電視新聞網。
“一些本已糟糕 - 這是可怕的,有時我跑出來了律師費錢,”他補充道。
“對於很多人來說是可怕的找人太專注於你摧毀了這麼久,我感到寬慰的是,這是所有部分結束了,但你永遠不知道,我一直在迷航豎起了不少羽毛。
“善有善報,惡有惡報,還有很多的東西,從來沒有打的消息,我想也很難,我什至不能開始解釋發生了什麼事,這是很難用語言來表達,甚至形容人“
萊蒙德承認,他沒有同情阿姆斯特朗和也認為,前車手是不是全心全意地承認他的方式錯誤。
“我永遠不會說永遠,但我不認為他已經準備好要完全誠實的,”他說。
“我不認為他永遠都是。我們會看到,但我覺得他有很多的問題與政府”。
“太多的行李”
星期日泰晤士報首席體育記者沃爾什寫了一本關於他的戰鬥揭露阿姆斯特朗,“七宗罪”,這導致報紙被起訴為150萬美元阿姆斯特朗的大膽建議,他被摻雜。
記者討伐揭露阿姆斯特朗 記者:阿姆斯特朗殘害生命 作者:鬧著阿姆斯特朗告白
沃爾什的同情誰選擇不欺騙騎自行車的人。
“我覺得對不起誰騎乾淨,得到了擰的人,這個世界上的克里斯托夫Bassons和菲利波Simeonis,”他告訴美國有線電視新聞網。
“有一些人認為,他應該還給他的巡迴賽冠軍,因為沒有一合法帶他們,但是這僅僅是合法化,他們做了什麼。
“對不起,但我覺得他應該得到掛斷了電話。阿姆斯特朗漸漸回到了騎自行車是一種無稽之談。”
阿姆斯特朗會見了自行車獨立改革委員會(中國保監會)五月,但該次會議的細節尚未公佈。
至於去年的奧普拉採訪時,沃爾什說:“我覺得他是真誠的,他想成為的地步。”
那麼他怎麼看阿姆斯壯在這一點上,什麼是前進的方向給他嗎?
“我看到的是一個人用的,現在是無關現實的掙扎,補充說:”沃爾什。“他有一些非常顯著的人,當他贏得了所有的旅遊,而在年後,即想在他面前。
“他是一個標誌性的數字,已經走了,我想他得到了他的生活,勇往直前,花時間與他的孩子們,有一個愉快的個人生活和打高爾夫,但他應該遠離公眾生活。 - - 有太多的包袱“。
承擔國家
更多的法律糾紛擺在面前的阿姆斯特朗。
最大的和潛在的最昂貴的是對他在阿姆斯特朗的前美國郵政服務隊贊助的情況下由美國聯邦政府。如果他失去了這將是一個更昂貴的一天,而不是當他在奧普拉。
“我想如果他能贏得這種情況下,這將是更大的比贏得7遊法國,而我認為他站在獲勝的機會,”美國記者里德Albergotti說。
華爾街日報記者,與記者同行凡妮莎奧康,寫下2013年的著作“Wheelmen:蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗,環法自行​​車賽和偉大的體育陰謀永遠”
疼痛蘭斯·阿姆斯特朗的足跡 球隊按摩師稱阿姆斯特朗摻雜
“美國司法部的部門不喜歡去試,除非它認為有獲勝的好機會,陪審員往往一邊與運動員,以及可能發生在這裡,”Albergotti建議。
“有一件事我們可以指望的是,他準備為另一次戰鬥。”
Albergotti認為,使得阿姆斯特朗這樣一個令人印象深刻的癌症倖存者和這樣一個令人印象深刻的騎車人已經對他不利,他試圖恢復自己的名聲,而他仍然戰鬥不受歡迎的人在美國
他與奧康的更大的興趣並沒有在興奮劑,但在陰謀不只是阿姆斯壯,但他周圍的人這麼多。
“如果他是真正的悔悟,真的覺得對他做了什麼的人喜歡格雷格·萊蒙德和Andreus不好,他會演戲不同,”Albergotti說。
“但他仍然試圖描繪萊蒙德為這個瘋狂的布澤爾,並取得了貝琪·安德魯看起來像一個歇斯底里的女人,他試圖摧毀人的聲譽,它是不是他真的解決。
“他似乎並沒有在所有被貶抑,你想看到的人在他的位置,他的作用幾乎就像他在環法自行車賽損失了一些時間,並須作出了起來,他能做到的同樣的事情,他總是做。
“它不這樣的。人們希望看到他的心臟。
“他認為他能夠取勝,他還是想擊敗所有人,如果他可以,你看它的方式,他採取司法美國能源部現在。
“我聽說,他在告訴別人他想要去嘗試和擊敗他們 - 這是因為,雖然這次審判是一個自行車比賽,他需要開始成為一個更好的人,沒有什麼可以站在他的方式離開了他。”
這是阿姆斯特朗的舉動旁邊。

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜
    創作者介紹
    創作者 evita6804 的頭像
    evita6804

    愛薇塔樂學英文

    evita6804 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()